This essay in its entirety is available in the newly-released book,
Before the Clangor of the Gun: the First World War Poetry of John Allan Wyeth.
Here is an excerpt:
"Wyeth, Pound & Imagism
"Wyeth, Pound & Imagism
More than any other English-language poet of the war,
Wyeth’s language is stripped clean of 19th-century tonalities
and devices. A contributing factor to Wyeth’s modernist style
might have been that, during the years immediately prior to the
publication of This Man’s Army, when he was almost certainly
composing his sonnets, Wyeth resided in the American colony
in Rapallo, Italy, where he was known to be friends with Ezra
Pound.
While it is impossible to know the nature, or extent, of
Pound’s influence on Wyeth, there is no denying that Wyeth’s
stringently honed descriptions—where every word contributes
to the presentation and every image is distilled to its
essentials—accord closely to the Imagist principles which
Pound espoused in the years before the war. Even the Imagist
stricture that the rhythm of a poem should possess the fluidity
of a musical phrase rather than the beat of a metronome, is not
violated by Wyeth’s sonnets, which display an unprecedented
metrical freedom within the general constraint of the form.
Whether Wyeth developed his acute descriptive powers under the influence of Pound, or from earlier influences, is a matter of conjecture. It is at least as plausible that the minutely observed and needle-sharp descriptions of Henry James provided the primary influence on Wyeth’s technique. According to Edmund Wilson, only he and Wyeth—of their literary circle at Princeton—read James seriously while they were there, and it was Wyeth who led Wilson to a full appreciation of James’ technique.
Wyeth’s reliance on chance, on working with whatever objects circumstance might provide, even when they serve no apparent thematic or metaphoric purpose, has a basic affinity with a precept of another major theorist of Imagism, T.E. Hulme, who was a direct influence on Pound. Hulme’s contention was that it is not the object itself that matters, but only its description. Any object will do as well as any other, including random objects served up by chance. The idea of employing randomness as a compositional principle may have been unusual in literary theory in those years, but in the visual arts the notion of the objet trouvé (“found object”) had been in the air since well before the war, from Picasso’s Still-life with Chair Caning, to Duchamp’s “readymades,” to Dada’s reliance on whatever the artist happened to pick up in the street. It is certainly no stretch to assume that Wyeth, with his years spent in New York, London and Paris, and his lifelong interest in contemporary movements in art, would have keep well abreast of such developments.
Wyeth’s reliance on circumstantial subject matter might tempt a less well-informed critic to dismiss Wyeth’s sonnets as mere documentary reportage, but if that were all his sonnets amounted to, they would lie flat and lifeless on the page. What we find instead is a body of work where the unsettled randomness of actual events is incorporated in such a way as to infuse each sonnet with an élan vital, a vital spark. Far from being the equivalent of old newspapers fit only for wrapping fish, Wyeth’s sonnets are living vignettes, rich in chlorine, chaos and all the random particularity of war."
Whether Wyeth developed his acute descriptive powers under the influence of Pound, or from earlier influences, is a matter of conjecture. It is at least as plausible that the minutely observed and needle-sharp descriptions of Henry James provided the primary influence on Wyeth’s technique. According to Edmund Wilson, only he and Wyeth—of their literary circle at Princeton—read James seriously while they were there, and it was Wyeth who led Wilson to a full appreciation of James’ technique.
Wyeth’s reliance on chance, on working with whatever objects circumstance might provide, even when they serve no apparent thematic or metaphoric purpose, has a basic affinity with a precept of another major theorist of Imagism, T.E. Hulme, who was a direct influence on Pound. Hulme’s contention was that it is not the object itself that matters, but only its description. Any object will do as well as any other, including random objects served up by chance. The idea of employing randomness as a compositional principle may have been unusual in literary theory in those years, but in the visual arts the notion of the objet trouvé (“found object”) had been in the air since well before the war, from Picasso’s Still-life with Chair Caning, to Duchamp’s “readymades,” to Dada’s reliance on whatever the artist happened to pick up in the street. It is certainly no stretch to assume that Wyeth, with his years spent in New York, London and Paris, and his lifelong interest in contemporary movements in art, would have keep well abreast of such developments.
Wyeth’s reliance on circumstantial subject matter might tempt a less well-informed critic to dismiss Wyeth’s sonnets as mere documentary reportage, but if that were all his sonnets amounted to, they would lie flat and lifeless on the page. What we find instead is a body of work where the unsettled randomness of actual events is incorporated in such a way as to infuse each sonnet with an élan vital, a vital spark. Far from being the equivalent of old newspapers fit only for wrapping fish, Wyeth’s sonnets are living vignettes, rich in chlorine, chaos and all the random particularity of war."
The record of the event on the Fokker D VII 2097/18 shot down on October 3, 1918 with the capture of the pilot, Under-Officer Hans Heinrich Marwede of the Royal Prussian Jagdstaffel 67, commonly abbreviated as Jasta 67, can now be found in Video on YouTube on the US National Archives channel - Flashes of Action: Actualities of the World War
ReplyDeleteThanks very much for that information! ---BJ Omanson
ReplyDelete